Time Warner, Sinclair reach deal | Th...

Time Warner, Sinclair reach deal | The Columbus Dispatch

There are 13 comments on the Columbus Dispatch story from Jan 16, 2011, titled Time Warner, Sinclair reach deal | The Columbus Dispatch. In it, Columbus Dispatch reports that:

Negotiations are still wrapping up, but Time Warner Cable customers in central Ohio no longer need to worry about stations disappearing.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Columbus Dispatch.

TW SUCKS

Fremont, OH

#2 Jan 16, 2011
Time Warner is the worst company I have ever dealt with. If there were an alternative to get Internet in my area I would drop Time Warner like a bad habit. I hope they go out of business and are bought by a company who understands customer service.
Mike

Groveport, OH

#3 Jan 16, 2011
What a stupid series of events. I wonder if this will be a recurring theme every year as it has been for the last two.

Maybe instead of scrolling messages next year, we can have newscasters reporting on it like it's important.... errr. well, I guess that already happened.
Many wonders

Norwich, OH

#4 Jan 16, 2011
Funny, Time Warner began as QUBE back in the 70's years later it was purchased by Time publication becoming Time-Warner.
Sinclair would state in there effort to keep the local news, that those on Time Warner would lose all shows, so if you are fans of Dancing with the Stars, or the View, those shows would be affected. Not true, those shows would remain.
So who do you trust, a station whose roots were started in Cols, or a station who was not honest with losing the format?
Retired Deputy

Chillicothe, OH

#6 Jan 16, 2011
Time Warner sucks. WOW is so much better.
Progressive Ohioan

Reynoldsburg, OH

#7 Jan 16, 2011
So what you've got, ostensibly, is two very wealthy entities fighting over and holding hostage the public, the property of which should be in our control to begin with. Why did we change from a society where the public owned the airwaves and controlled content to letting cable/internet/wireless companies dictate to us what we can or cannot have. They are running their cables through public property. We should have some control and/or regulation over how they conduct themselves. And over how much they charge us.
Dimed to death

Columbus, OH

#8 Jan 16, 2011
Who does Sinclair think that money will come from? It comes from us, the subscribes. So, Sinclair wants us to pay for what they give away to everybody else for free. Why should I agree to that?
free tv

Fostoria, OH

#9 Jan 16, 2011
It is crazy that TWC has to pay them for free tv stations! greedy over the air stations!
tindy

Columbus, OH

#10 Jan 16, 2011
At&t is evil. Time warner is just awful. Praise Jesus and Isreal.
Concerned Citizen

Reynoldsburg, OH

#11 Jan 16, 2011
The coming price increase will definitely be more than 10 cents per station per customer
Interesting

United States

#12 Jan 16, 2011
Annie wrote:
If I were you Warner customers, I would quit them. They will now raise your prices. Go to Direct TV or ATT.uverse. They are cheaper and greater, more programs. Wonder who they will go after next?
I'm thinking of doing exactly that. The entire mess left a bad taste in my mouth. Hope TW lost a lot of customers already, but now the customers will have to pay. It's all a crock.
lobozoid

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#13 Jan 16, 2011
Oh boy, more of that dumbass chansux news and Jerry Swinger
Bill

Columbus, OH

#14 Jan 16, 2011
I'm not really sure why TW or any other carrier has to pay Sinclair to broadcast their stations rather than the other way around. Personally I receive all my channels off the air at no cost that indicates that most if not all revenue is generated through advertisement. If TW were to stop carrying channel 6 and 28 I would think more damage would be done to those to channels from loss of viewership.
C Kersey

United States

#15 Mar 18, 2018
"The big media companies have launched major propaganda campaigns against Sinclair because Sinclair is about to join them as a big media company by buying Tribune. Things are never quite what they seem!" ---Sharyl Attkisson, 11 March 2018

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Telecom Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Residents seek council's help in cell tower fight (Sep '12) May '18 BIG profits 12
News Senate votes for net neutrality return, but maj... May '18 He Named Me Black... 5
News U.S. 'net neutrality' rules will end on June 11... May '18 Christsharian Col... 12
News Toronto Hydro says close to 4,000 still without... May '18 beware of Doog 1
News Hundreds of thousands without power following d... May '18 some still no power 1
News Hundreds of thousands without power following d... May '18 Climate Change eh 1
How to set up a profile? Apr '18 harpooncat 1